Youon the web or in your own AI chat
He lives in Bratislava. On 1 February 2024 he founded a Slovak s.r.o. and paid in its whole capital of 5 000 €. On 1 June 2026 he sold 40 % of it to a Slovak holding company for 300 000 €, and keeps the rest.
Slovak tax under § 15 písm. a) · on 297 500,00 €, the gain the act taxes
The agentjudges, consolidates, asks only what matters
- personal income tax
- lives in Bratislava: resident in Slovakia
- held since 1 February 2024
- sold 40 % for 300 000 €
- paid in 2 000 € for that part
- the stake is not business property
- nothing to ask: no rule is left waiting on a fact
- no legal review needed
Colliderthe engine, open mode
- unsaid, taken as none: income from employment, income taxed apart, like interest
- from the official table: subsistence minimum 284,13 €
The cardsone sentence of the act each, frozen
- § 2 písm. d) bod 1applies
- § 8 ods. 1 písm. f)applies
- § 9 ods. 1 písm. i)taxes only the excess · 297 500,00 €
- § 9 ods. 1 písm. k)does not apply
- § 15 písm. a)8 356,83 € + 4 091,47 € + 4 398,33 € + 77 871,39 € = 94 718,02 €
01 / 05
You say what happenedYou say what happened
In plain words, in the box on the web or in your own AI chat. No form, no codes.
It picks the area of law and states the facts you gave, in the law’s own terms. Anything it adds on its own judgment it lists with its reason, so you can correct it.
Open mode: whatever was not said is taken as not the case and listed. A value another law sets, like the subsistence minimum, comes from the official table, never assumed.
Each card is one sentence of the Slovak act, frozen and tested. The ones whose conditions are met compute; the agent lets them stand, and would set one aside only if it plainly did not fit, with a reason you see.
The figure, and the paragraph it rests on. A question is put only when a rule is left waiting on a fact, and a legal review is flagged when one is needed. Here, neither.